Weekly clippings #26 - Clickbait vs science, African poverty vs climate policy, ESG debt and pain
This week in science we have the contrast between the infamous island of Tuvalu which is supposedly at risk of being flooded by rising seas, yet is actually growing in size (as are most similar islands), an article examining the enormous bias that comes when you only examine one side of a story, and a fascinating study finding that ocean microplastics are created around volcanic ocean vents.
In the category of Investment/Economics we have articles discussing the need to choose between costly and ineffective climate policies and helping actual people suffering from poverty, then news of ESG-linked debt coming under pressure.
In Absurdities, read about how if you want a study to show how EVs are cleaner than previous research, you simply make unjustified assumptions about carbon intensity.
My Message to Leaders at Africa Energy Week 2023 For the sake of Africans and the rest of the world, African leaders need to confidently reject the net-zero movement and embrace energy freedom–including fossil fuel freedom.
Will the World Bank Choose Climate Change Over Poverty? Research repeatedly shows that spending on core development priorities would help much more and much faster per dollar spent than putting funds toward climate. That is because real development investments can dramatically change lives for the better right now and make poorer countries more resilient against climate-related problems such as diseases and natural disasters. By contrast, even drastic emission reductions won’t deliver noticeably different outcomes for a generation or more.
5 actions for fund managers to overcome ESG pain points It requires juggling a growing and sometimes conflicting list of demands from regulators, clients, non-governmental organizations and others.
The Tyranny of ESG Has Run Its Course Good companies have always thought about this stuff — just without the relentless greenwashing and grandstanding.
If you want to prove that BEVs are much cleaner than what was found in these past studies, you build a model that assumes the carbon intensity of electricity generation (grams CO2 emitted by producing a kWh) will dramatically reduce over the next two decades.




Comments
Post a Comment